Adjunct Faculty Evaluation
The purpose of the faculty evaluation process is to provide opportunity for guidance, feedback, and reflection regarding classroom practices. The evaluation process is meant to be a positive experience focused upon professional growth. The evaluation process consists of the following:
In-Class Observation
All new adjunct and dual credit instructors will receive a formal in-class observation during their first semester of employment with Moberly Area Community College. Continuing instructors will receive a formal in-class observation periodically (typically every two to three years), regardless of whether they were continuously under contract during that time span or not.
In-class observations will be conducted by the one of the following individuals:
-
the Vice President for Instruction,
-
the Dean of Arts and Sciences,
-
the Dean of Workforce Development and Technical Education,
-
the Dean of Health Sciences,
-
the Associate Dean of Instruction,
-
the Site Director,
-
or a designated Lead Instructor.
Prior to the formal observation, adjunct and dual credit faculty scheduled for evaluation will be contacted by an observer to arrange a date. The observation will typically be scheduled early enough in the semester to allow time for formative feedback. Additionally, one of the individuals listed above may occasionally conduct informal, unscheduled observations.
By the observation date, the instructor must provide the observer with access to or a copy of the course syllabus for use in the review process. Observers may also request information about student assessment or samples of assessment measures used in the course.
Evaluation Form
During the formal observation, the observer will use a five-point Likert scale to assess the following areas of instructional performance:
-
Knowledge of Subject: Exhibits an accurate, up-to-date knowledge of the subject; summarizes and synthesizes content; demonstrates the importance and significance of the subject and relates it to real-life situations; promotes the acquisition of factual information and/or fundamental principles, generalizations or theories.
-
Organization of Class: Has well-organized course syllabus with well-defined objectives; gives the students a clear overview of the material to be covered and relates it to the objectives of the course; organizes the presentations in an effective way and at an appropriate pace; frames the class session so that students understand how the materials fit with the materials studied previously or to be undertaken.
-
Classroom Management: Deals with disruptive or dominating students effectively; arrives on time prepared to begin class; brings the period to conclusion in a timely manner.
-
Instructional Techniques: Clearly communicates the subject matter verbally; handwriting is legible; uses a variety of teaching techniques, materials, and support services; promotes class discussion (where appropriate) as opposed to asking for mere responses to questions; exhibits enthusiasm for the subject; makes the class challenging, thought-provoking, and interesting; uses clear and understandable questions; makes assignments of a reasonable length and level.
-
Student Rapport: Exhibits an attitude toward students that encourages learning and active participation in the class; displays concern for student learning and development; displays sensitivity to student problems and points of view.
-
Evaluation of Student Learning: Includes a clear grading scale, assignments, and activities aligned with course learning outcomes. (Observers will review information from the course syllabus and any other materials provided by the instructor.)
-
Course Resources: Includes the designated (or dual credit school-approved) textbook, a completed online syllabus, accessibility friendly online resources, and instructional materials aligned with course outcomes, such as PowerPoint presentations and other learning resources. (Observers will review information from the course syllabus and any other materials provided by the instructor.)
Instructors will receive a rating for each area based on the following scale: 5 -Outstanding, 4 -Exceeds Expectations, 3 -Meets Expectations, 2 -Needs Improvement, 1 -Unsatisfactory, A -Insufficient Information. A rating of “2” or below results in an observation the following semester. The evaluation form is provided on page 3 for your reference.
Follow-Up Conference
The evaluation process culminates in a conference between the instructor and their observer in which they will review and discuss all materials related to the evaluation. Note the conference date on the form where indicated. The conference may be held on the same day as the observation.
Any ratings of "1" or "2" on the Adjunct & Dual Credit Faculty Classroom Observation Form may require a written plan to be completed by the instructor and Vice President for Instruction, the Dean, or the Dean’s designee to address areas of concern. Ratings of "1" or failure to show improvement in an identified area of concern during consecutive evaluations may result in the instructor’s failure to receive a subsequent contract.